Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:36:15 -0500

> Richard Man wrote:
> 
>> Look, my point is simply that for my purpose, I am as happy about my
>> E-3 pics as my M8u pics
> 
> That's really what matters, isn't it?
> 
>> and a number of people say that the Leica
>> pics are obviously, intrinsically, better.
> 
> I don't know what people you are referring to, but I saw a difference just 
> by
> looking at web jpg images.  Not by looking for a red dot.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
"> That's really what matters, isn't it?"

And how you define " pics ".
Which most people think of what fits in their next blog.
A couple of hundred pixels across.
Its what they're looking at on their monitor.
And could have just as easily been done with no apparent difference with a
credit card camera.
By which I don't mean a camera paid for with a credit card.



[Rabs]
Mark William Rabiner





In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u)