Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:40:53 -0800
References: <10363428.1264214153729.JavaMail.root@wamui-june.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <78D60420-0720-4CD2-9C76-31ACDF77EE38@frozenlight.eu>
 
OK, I just cropped everything to 4x3 proportion for now. Enjoy!

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/richardman/E3M8BakeOff


On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> 
wrote:
> My guesses were 100% correct, and it was not even based on picture 
> quality...it was obvious from the aspect ratio in most cases. If you 
> really want to make a blind test, you must crop all the images square. 
> Otherwise, one can immediately see the 3:2 vs. 4:3 format from the 
> respective cameras.
>

-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u)