Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Summilux 50 Inquiry
From: mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:33:24 -0800
References: <7f871f630912121220r7401e1ffked70b84ed5737732@mail.gmail.com> <C749ADC1.5C5C%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk>
 
I have asked, and am awaiting a response. I just couldn't help myself!

-Yama

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Steve Unsworth <lug at 
steveunsworth.co.uk>wrote:

> Wouldn't the simplest option be to ask the seller?
>
> Steve
>
>
> On 12/12/09 20:20, "Yama Nawabi" <mknawabi.lug at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello, I recently checked craigslist, and a seller was selling a "50mm
> > Summilux version 3 #334****".
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Summilux 50 Inquiry)
 In reply to: Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] Summilux 50 Inquiry)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Summilux 50 Inquiry)