Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Lightroom or CS4 Bridge?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:05:23 -0500

> And you're suggesting
> that you don't look at your images
> before you develop them.
> 
> It's not the "top billing"
> It's the "first step"
> 
> Come on Mark.
> We all begin the post production work
> on the light table.
> 
> Your current light table is called Bridge.
> It's where you begin the post production process.
> 
> Did you not have a light table in your darkroom?
> or just outside of it?
> 
> Of course you did;
> and it had a wonderful schneider or rodenstock loupe right there on it.
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> On Dec 6, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for taking the Time George and effort but on your last post
>> I just
>> remember this structure:
>> 
>>     LIBRARY
>>     DEVELOP
>>     SLIDE SHOW
>>     PRINT
>>     WEB
>> 
>> 
>> Top billing goes to LIBRARY.
>> DEVELOP is second banana.
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>> 


I'm saying I'm going to digitally balance my images in a program primarily
designed for that. Photoshop.
And edit and sort and organize it in a program primarily designed for that.
Bridge or Lightroom.

I'm sure Lightroom is much better for such a thing than bridge.
Lightroom one was not. It gave me the creeps. I wanted that technology in
Bridge.


Mark William Rabiner





In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Lightroom or CS4 Bridge?)