Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not
From: chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich)
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:20 -0400
References: <C7016E5D.56BDB%mark@rabinergroup.com> <p06230900c701d06bc4b7@[10.1.16.129]> <4ADCC9AB.6040204@comporium.net> <015e01ca5114$b44de500$1ce9af00$@net> <4ADD0429.8040708@comporium.net> <016201ca513c$b803b9e0$280b2da0$@net> <92D5A478-3BEB-494C-B0C5-714FDDE9A8FF@gmail.com> <4ADD9577.8020407@comporium.net>

More like, to win a Nobel Prize your research must support our 
ideology.  Remember that nearly all PR and journalism exists to 
support the totalitarian structure of corporations.


At 06:48 AM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
>Steve Barbour wrote:
>>
>>of course true, idiocy or not...
>>
>>but what kind of game are they playing?
>>
>>this, to bring it back toward my world ...is like saying, to win a 
>>Nobel prize in science you must use a certain size test tube;  or 
>>to do an acceptable surgical procedure you must use a certain size blade...
>>
>>Steve
>Stock photography is not about art or good photographs.  It's about 
>what the customer needs to sell their widget or illustrate their 
>point in an editorial article.  The same photograph that takes first 
>place in a photography contest would not do well at all as 
>stock.  If you read Rohn Engh's book on Sell and Resell Your photos, 
>he classes them as type A and type B photos.  Type A photos are 
>beautiful but don't sell as stock.  Type B photos may look like they 
>are nothing impressive, but they illustrate the point the customer 
>wants to make.  His book is the best resource for anybody wanting to 
>sell stock.
>
>Tina
>www.tinamanley.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)