Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Better bokeh?
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:19:36 -0500
References: <daaeb97e0909271718q72da5c9ambd9be52eb882e12e@mail.gmail.com><52DBF45E83C7417187EA5618A9A0498E@jimnichols><daaeb97e0909272041t2aed83aeva67a763cd9cee12b@mail.gmail.com><F3862003F57A4B25AD23F8C3723620BB@jimnichols> <daaeb97e0909272112m6663903pe367870af6a2608e@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Jim,

Yes, if you are referring to the yellow lily, I beleive it is typical of the 
Summicron.  There is one other in the gallery, made with the Summicron, that 
I feel is the best that I have achieved. The link is below:

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Rhody+by+Summicron.tif.html

I don't think this lens will disappoint you.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Laird" <digiratidoc at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Better bokeh?


> Jim,
>
> I think the bokeh in your first Summicron image is superb. Is this
> typical with this lens in your experience?
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Yellow+Lily+2.tif.html>
>
> Jim
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> 
> wrote:
>> Jim,
>>
>> Prior to getting the Leica-R lenses, I was experimenting with some Pentax
>> Takumars that I had available. For pure OOF areas, I suspect that the 
>> Taks
>> were as nice as the Leicas. I got the Leica lenses because the in-focus
>> performance is better than anything else that I have found.
>>
>> As to the different versions of the Summicron, I can't answer. IIRC, mine
>> is a 3-cam, with a retractable shade.
>>
>> Takumar bokeh:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Fuchsia_Blooms_sm.jpg.html
>>
>> Zuiko 14-54 bokeh:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Garden+Spider+final.jpg.html
>>
>> Old Hannimex 135:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Ruby+Throat+Female.tif.html
>>
>> Another with 60/2.8 Elmarit-R:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Watchful+Hummer.jpg.html
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Laird" <digiratidoc at 
>> gmail.com>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 10:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Better bokeh?
>>
>>
>>> Thanks Jim, those are outstanding images, but I'm not really
>>> interested in how 'sharp' the images is but rather the juxtaposition
>>> of the somewhat sharp to the absolutely out of focus areas of the
>>> image. That's why I'm interested in which lens offers the best
>>> 'bokeh'. Is there any difference in bokeh between the different
>>> versions of the 50/2.0 Summicron 1,2, and 3 cam lenses? If so, which
>>> offers the best, smoothest out of focus image. And will the famous
>>> Leica 'bokeh' make a significant difference over my antiquated Canon
>>> 50/1.8?
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> James,
>>>>
>>>> I am using the 50/2.0 Summicron-R, and the 60/2.8 Elmarit-R Macro. The
>>>> bokeh is fine at large apertures with both of them. The advantage of 
>>>> the
>>>> 60
>>>> is that one can focus down to about 10 inches, though the DOF at that
>>>> point
>>>> is VERY shallow. The following images in my gallery might give you and
>>>> idea
>>>> of what to expect.
>>>>
>>>> My first post using the Elmarit:
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Rose.jpg.html
>>>>
>>>> A similar post with the Summicron:
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Yellow+Lily+2.tif.html
>>>>
>>>> Jim Nichols
>>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Laird" 
>>>> <digiratidoc at gmail.com>
>>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 7:18 PM
>>>> Subject: [Leica] Better bokeh?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Which R lens in the 'standard' range (50-60mm) has the best bokeh?
>>>>> I've found an interest in the macro world and shoot a lot with my old
>>>>> trusty Canon 50 1.8 with a Kenko 12mm extension tube resulting in
>>>>> shots like
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/digiratidoc/Bokeh/>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm interested in trying out an R lens due to Leicas legendary bokeh.
>>>>> Which one is the 'best', if there is such a thing?
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Better bokeh?)
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Better bokeh?)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Better bokeh?)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Better bokeh?)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Better bokeh?)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Better bokeh?)