Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] leica x1 @ popflash
From: dennis at hale-pohaku.net (Dennis)
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:50:50 -1000
References: <440b792d0909082124o52a31b6p45706fbac43662b8@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0909082151h6e77f0b1wf0202ba128d0ce36@mail.gmail.com> <3A125937-39C6-4370-8D96-FC3F9F8CFA09@btinternet.com> <4AA80D4B.9070102@hale-pohaku.net> <7c7efb430909091316j6707fb66x95e1a4dd749ddbfd@mail.gmail.com>

Not to worry, I won't. I also hope it makes Leica a lot of money, it 
just won't be mine.



Ken Iisaka wrote:
> If you don't want it, don't buy it.
>
> I hope it will be a huge success for Leica, so that they will be able
> to fund continuing R&D for the M system and bring down the cost of the
> S system!
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Dennis<dennis at hale-pohaku.net> wrote:
>   
>> The price is ridiculous. Not having interchangeable lenses, very un-Leica
>> like. The only thing to it's possible credit is that it should have good 
>> low
>> light performance considering the size of the sensor in comparison to 
>> other
>> p&s cameras.
>>
>> Otherwise, more neck jewelery.
>>
>> Frank Dernie wrote:
>>     
>>> looks like it, and just what I wanted too, except the price...
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   


Replies: Reply from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
In reply to: Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from dennis at hale-pohaku.net (Dennis) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)