Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yet another blunt-instrument law proposed by a grandstanding politician purporting to protect us from perps, perverts and pedophiles. The comments at the ABC site pretty much point out the uselessness and absurdity of such a law. The bill's author is a rather colorful character who reportedly is very interested in becoming a U.S. Senator. I suspect the bill is just future campaign fodder. Note that it has no co-sponsors. Of course, as the owner of an M8 with the original shutter, I have nothing to fear from such a law, even if it is extended to cover digital cameras. You M8.2 owners and prospective M9 owners better save your pennies to send your camera back to Solms for a retrofit shutter downgrade if this bill passes. :-) --Peter > Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:43:52 -0400 > From: Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu> > Subject: [Leica] should cameras with silent shutters be outlawed? > To: "lug at leica-users.org" <lug at leica-users.org> > Message-ID: > <9F07836ED74F1C42AA69DFBAF8A1E2F11FC8F427B3 at MBX1.asc.local> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Proposed legislation would require that cell phone cameras make a noise to > alert victims they're being photographed: > > http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=6750825&page=1 > > it's still in committee: > > http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h414/show > > I think it's been the wish of many Leica photographers that they could be > silent and invisible. Technology steps up to the plate, the world changes. >