Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Paper recommendation please
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:35:22 -0700
References: <4cfa589b0909031611n41f77bs530ece217e299874@mail.gmail.com> <20090903235650.LIQ19505.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>

Is that what used to be simply Premium Luster? I've liked that and
glad to see it's in reasonably sized rolls.

Adam

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
> Epson Premium Photo Paper Luster should be a natural. ?8.3" x 32' roll is
> $30 at Atlex. ?Nice paper. ?A 10" x 100' roll is $44.
>
> Ken
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-
>> bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Adam Bridge
>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 6:12 PM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: [Leica] Paper recommendation please
>>
>> I'm printing some images to put into note cards as gifts. I'd rather
>> have a luster surface or even a glossy but luster seems more like it.
>>
>> I'll be printing on the Epson 4000.
>>
>> Recommendations? Roll format would be nice but sheets are also good.
>>
>> Oh, and cost is an object so nothing $10 a foot (grin).
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Paper recommendation please)
In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Paper recommendation please)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Paper recommendation please)