Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 v M9--better printers needed
From: chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:54:48 -0400
References: <29486CF4-A88F-4C05-AAE9-4F79A89E4D66@usjet.net> <C6B4CA9A.1B3C%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk>
 
Those things go for about $30K.  Nice.  Sort of takes the wind out of 
all that inking for me anyway  A machine I could love, unlike an ink 
jet printer  I could never love one of those too messy.  In 10 years 
I'll pick up a used one for 5 years worth of ink I didn't have to 
buy.  I'm not biased...really.


At 05:05 PM 8/21/2009, you wrote:

><http://de-vere.com/products.htm>
>
>Steve
>
>
>On 21/8/09 14:58, "Robert Meier" <robertmeier at usjet.net> wrote:
>
> > I'm not
> > sure if anyone prints digitally onto fiber base B&W paper.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M8 vs. M9--better printers needed)
 In reply to: Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] M8 v M9--better printers needed)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M8 v M9--better printers needed)