Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thought you were gonna show pictures, Richard! These charts mean nothing to me. Intellectually, I can read up on what they mean, but I fail to see how to translate it into actual picture taking experience. The latter, however, does tell me that the Leica lenses are superior, period. I have no personal experience with the 50mm Summarit, but the 35mm version is superb for the price. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Richard Man wrote: > OK, the MIGHTY 50/2.5 Summariat vs. the lowly 12-60. > > At wide open, I'd say the Oly's not looking too shabby, edge to edge > (yes, the edge is closer for the 4/3...) Better even? But lets not > push a point too far. > > http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/leica50rait.jpg > > http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/oly12-60.jpg > > -- > // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com > // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog: > http://rfman.wordpress.com > // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963 > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information