Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:36:13 -0700
References: <380-22009841321365230@M2W021.mail2web.com> <623541.16361.qm@web82105.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 
Oh hey, this is in LR 2.4 already. Yes, "Camera Standard" is much
better than the "Adobe Standard." That's the basis of my statement :-)
Camera Standard.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Bob Adler<rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Just go here and install the profiles:
> http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Profiles
> Take your?RAW images from both cameras. In the develop tab click between 
> the adobe standard and these profiles for?each. You'll notice a BIG 
> difference in gradation and detail.
>
> Better yet, create your?own specific profile for each of your 2 cameras 
> with the DNG editor. It's really easy, especially for a propeller head 
> like you :-)
>
> Whether one system is better than another is moot. Using this tool your 
> images from both systems will be noticably improved. Isn't that what 
> matters?
>



-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
Replies: Reply from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)