Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/07/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Any comparison between the 18mm Elmar to the WATE?
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:15:04 -0700
References: <004d01ca0df0$bc838b10$358aa130$@net> <005701ca0dfc$63bc3980$2b34ac80$@net> <007701ca0e71$b2dd6eb0$18984c10$@net> <36172e5a0907271556o6a4e3830i98cf84c651bff61b@mail.gmail.com>
Geoff, I did read your response.... However, there is no comparison because
you did not get a chance to shoot the WATE. I did appreciate both your and
Erwin assesment.....
Fair enough, the 18 Super Duper is just that. However, I have been curious
about the comparison for the 18 mm FL.....and no one seems to ever have made
the comparison.....
Which I find strange, considering the pickiness and curiosity of Leica
owners.....
Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Any comparison between the 18mm Elmar to the WATE?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Any comparison between the 18mm Elmar to the WATE?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Any comparison between the 18mm Elmar to the WATE?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Any comparison between the 18mm Elmar to the WATE?)