Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Pretty much what Tina says! An inkjet print by any other name is still an inkjet print. Nash Editions are yet another version. S.d. On Jul 26, 2009, at 10:08 PM, Bob Adler wrote: > I thought I would pose this question to this group. To try to put > some parameters around the question, I am being told that my injet > prints, using archival inks and paper, are not "giclee". > Though I know this term, directly translated, means to spray, and I > know that much of the use of this term by photographers is for > "marketing" purposes, I am curious if you believe that the use of > this term for my prints is accurate (archival pigments sprayed on > archival papers of either scanned negatives or digital photographs). > Thanks very much for any opinions you care to share. Any pointers > to truly authoritative literature or sources would be greatly > appreciated. > Best, > Bob > > Bob Adler > Palo Alto, CA > http://www.raflexions.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information