Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Interesting point Mark. The DMR could more easily be compared to an R8/9 insofar as it's the same body, mirror, prism, shutter and lens set simply changing the back from film to digital capture. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Jul 14, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > I would make more sense to me to compare medium format digital to > medium > format film. Comparing it to cropped digital is not to me a > comparison; but > a contrast. Which his to say "look how these two things have > nothing in > common isn't that interesting?". > > > Mark William Rabiner > > > >> From: Richard Man <richard.lists at gmail.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:23:02 -0700 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] The Leica M8.2 Experience >> >> *When* I get my M8/.2, I would compare it to my Mamiya M7II. >> That'd be >> a good comparison: big neg, or convenience of digital. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information