Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Exposure was OK but I could do with a bit more shutter speed to avoid camera shake which is unavoidable at 1/6 sec. The dealer could not explain except supposed that digital photography differed from film. I don't think it's that simple an explanation. Dan K. From: FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie at btinternet.com> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 07:40:03 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [Leica] 50 Summilux-M on Panasonic G1 How was the exposure? --- On Sat, 11/7/09, Dan Khong <dankhong at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Dan Khong <dankhong at gmail.com> > Subject: [Leica] 50 Summilux-M on Panasonic G1 > To: lug at leica-users.org > Date: Saturday, 11 July, 2009, 11:56 AM > Folks, > > I had a chance to try out the Summilux-M on a Lumix G1 > using a Voigtlander > adapter. > > Set at f5.6, aperture priority mode, I noticed that the > shutter speed on the > camera was 6 on the camera, which I interpret as 1/6 sec. > Checking the > exposure setting with my Voigtlander VC meter revealed an > exposre setting of > 1/60 sec at f5.6. ISO was 400 on both > camera and meter. > > Shots taken showed some degree of camera shake consistent > with a shutter > speed of 1/6 sec. > > I wonder why is there such a vast difference in the shutter > speed on the > camera as compared with that on the external exposure > meter? > > Dan K. > > _