Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50 Summilux-M on Panasonic G1
From: dankhong at gmail.com (Dan Khong)
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:32:59 +0800

Exposure was OK but I could do with a bit more shutter speed to avoid camera
shake which is unavoidable at 1/6 sec. The dealer could not explain except
supposed that digital photography differed from film. I don't think it's
that simple an explanation.
Dan K.


From: FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie at btinternet.com>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 07:40:03 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: [Leica] 50 Summilux-M on Panasonic G1

How was the exposure?

--- On Sat, 11/7/09, Dan Khong <dankhong at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Dan Khong <dankhong at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Leica] 50 Summilux-M on Panasonic G1
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Date: Saturday, 11 July, 2009, 11:56 AM
> Folks,
>
> I had a chance to try out the Summilux-M on a Lumix G1
> using a Voigtlander
> adapter.
>
> Set at f5.6, aperture priority mode, I noticed that the
> shutter speed on the
> camera was 6 on the camera, which I interpret as 1/6 sec.
> Checking the
> exposure setting with my Voigtlander VC meter revealed an
> exposre setting of
> 1/60 sec at f5.6.   ISO was 400 on both
> camera and meter.
>
> Shots taken showed some degree of camera shake consistent
> with a shutter
> speed of 1/6 sec.
>
> I wonder why is there such a vast difference in the shutter
> speed on the
> camera as compared with that on the external exposure
> meter?
>
> Dan K.
>
> _


Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] 50 Summilux-M on Panasonic G1)
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 50 Summilux-M on Panasonic G1)
Reply from pasvorn at boonmark.net (Pasvorn Boonmark) ([Leica] 50 Summilux-M on Panasonic G1)
Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] 50 Summilux-M on Panasonic G1)