Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I owned a 2000 Catera, Jim. Difficult to enter and leave, heating and A/C problems, but, on the road, it drove like a dream. That was the last GM buy for me. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Shulman" <jshul at comcast.net> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 7:25 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: American Styling > There are many things that helped to kill the US auto industry, well above > the styling excess of 50s and 60s cars. > > Corporate Arrogance would head my list, beginning with lackluster to > dreadful quality control. The prevailing feeling in the 50s and 60s was > that customers would trade in their cars every two or three years, so why > build a car that would endure? One former Ford executive who, when I > asked > about the metal parts of early Mustangs that were not galvanized or > painted, > said, "these cars were built to last as long as the payment book." > Consumer > Reports recently discussed the relative quality of the US automakers > product, which still fell short of many of their competitors' models. GM > was considered not bad, Ford was considered better, and Chrysler still > abysmal. Given this, would you put your money on "not bad", when for the > same money or less you could own "excellent"? > > Next would be tone-deafness to consumer preferences about auto size, > mileage, and safety features. For every excuse that Detroit offered, a > foreign competitor would answer with a product that offered size, > efficiency, and safety that exceeded customer expectations. > > Then would come internal inertia, where the organizations were more > focused > on their corporate needs than the customer's demands. Those of us who > remember the awful generic GM autos of the 80s can attest to the problems > of > putting "badge engineering" above customer demand for cars differentiated > by > both style and engineering. Cadillac Cimarron, anyone? Or the > Opel-derived > Catera? > > Finally would come the myopia of executive leadership of the past > thirty-plus years, which believed that their successors would fix the > problems they avoided. Alfred Sloan predicted in the late 1940s that a GM > defined-benefit pension plan would eventually bring the company to > financial > ruin. When GM owned 50% of the US car market, it was less of a > concern--but > as market share declined (and as retirees lived longer than their parents > or > grandparents) it became a huge problem. > > Jim Shulman > Wynnewood, PA > Who is still waiting for his '57 Dodge to come out of the repair shop. > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net at leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Ric > Carter > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 8:06 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: American Styling > > I'm a child of the '50s and '60s > > I LOVE excess;^) > > ric > > > On Jun 23, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote: > >> >> If you are trying to show us some of the excesses that helped to >> kill the American auto industry, you >> are succeeding! > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >