Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]i agree wholeheartedly original = fine photograph sharpened example = artifice with artifacts comparative prints may tell a different story Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Jun 18, 2009, at 10:38 AM, simon jessurun wrote: > Like the original better.Ok it,s vague but that gives it soem mystery > eeriness even (is that a word?) ok the second one hides the glass a > bit but > introduces unnatural artifacts to my tastethx for showing the > original,simon > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> > wrote: > >> At 08:16 AM 6/18/2009, you wrote: >> >>> I probably missed the link to the unsharpened version but find >>> this one to >>> look unnatural ,at least the full size one.personally I would bin >>> it.,my >>> cents,simon >>> >> >> Unsharpened is here: http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/113843620 >> >> >> Tina >> >> Tina Manley >> www.tinamanley.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information