Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It would be interesting though doing a lot of Noctilux work in the near macro area where it tradionally carped out on you. It, the traditional version did not focus as close as most the other 50's. Closer than 3 feet I think. Not its neck of the woods. The magnification limit was a tad loose and could be hard to get used to. Especially in the days when everybody shot film and you wanted to print full frame black border and not crop and loose your black border. I'm sure the lens performs nice enough in the 1 to 3 foot area. And of course the razor thin in focus area becomes even sharper; then ever before. I'd be doing a lot of bracketing my focusing by rocking back and forth. And tapping my foot. Tonight at the Leica gallery which by the way is on a second wind as it was history a few months ago there was a guy with what looked like an M lens on his Canon Mark something which said Leica on it. The Camera said Leica on it. I asked the guy and it turned out to be an R lens. Why would they name their camera "Mark"? Mark William Rabiner > From: Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:10:35 -0700 > To: 'Leica Users Group' <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Noctilux in Nikon D300 > > > Which means that you will always have ( roughly) 20mm of too much helical > out there when you wish to do infinity focus. > > Someone else can do the math to see what is the farthest you will be able > to > focus, sharply. > > Frank Filippone > red735i at earthlink.net >