Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:50:39 -0500
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E95D0@case-email.casefoods.com> <8D441F08-A3C2-4399-9072-23E0DDF3C858@cox.net> <p0623090ac64a26cf9ee9@10.0.1.199> <8BFF4EFE-F7E1-4804-B0F3-B25ED454FE3B@cox.net> <36172e5a0906012232n225ff0acg55dd249ae410ca0e@mail.gmail.com> <4A24C410.4030905@sfr.fr> <A197E35B-97C1-493A-A4D6-FDD78869CAB8@cox.net> <36172e5a0906020941r257709cch4f705c3956cc3951@mail.gmail.com> <D73E99D6-2BDF-4FFF-B586-C60D77E4B757@cox.net> <67EDF791-A8A8-452F-A699-8C7F2AB7A274@mac.com> <36172e5a0906021229h319002e6ueadee965b222ebcc@mail.gmail.com> <928113.5958.qm@web82101.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Having a most remarkable print of a tree and clouds by Geoff in my  
possession;
I suspect Geoff missed the "no"
as in
"reportage is by [no] means the only reason for superb Leica glass"

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Jun 2, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Bob Adler wrote:

> Geoff,
> I'm I reading you right? Are you saying that the only reason for  
> Leica glass is for street reportage?
> Best,
> Bob
>  Bob Adler
> Palo Alto, CA
> http://www.raflexions.com
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 12:29:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?
>
> George, at 12x18 it is stunning in several forms. I may try the  
> limit of my
> 3800 soon. We shall talk when I'm home.
> I do also subscribe to the view that larger prints are meant to be
> viewedfrom further way and with the basics in place there is little  
> to limit
> the print size if that's appropriate for your end purpose.
> Steve's viewpoints are perfectly valid of course, but for me street
> reportage is by means the only reason for superb Leica glass



Replies: Reply from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Salgado in Sunday NY Times)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)