Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 18:55:15 -0400

The jelly fish shooters didn't care!
Nor the Cloudscape crowd.
When you shoot cotton Candy you can do just dandy.
And I'll let Cole Porter finish the rest.

Do Tree's Moir??
Somewhere in the rain forest of South America I bet there's one that does.
Birds do it bee's do it....


When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie
That's a Moir?.


Mark William Rabiner



> From: George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 11:18:50 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
> 
> It would be quite interesting to find out if this has veracity Jayanand.
> The only way to determine this would be to have the various models
> available with and without AA.
> Then we could determine an accurate percentage of AA "want."
> 
> When I followed the Medium Format Digital developments closely
> it appeared that the moire solution "wanters" were primarily fashion
> and portrait shooters concerned with fabric.
> The photo illustrators, product and architectural shooters wanted rid
> of the AA.




In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)