Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/05/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming)
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:55:17 +0800
References: <41C24C1D-9BE1-4FF8-9718-01876E26F4FB@gmail.com> <36172e5a0905281714q742471b4ha8c4f9f6814267e0@mail.gmail.com> <99D7F0AD-9B37-443F-A50E-01A4F7C5011C@mac.com> <36172e5a0905281725j51c25c01v3f55bc4c9fc81901@mail.gmail.com> <734E89E8-38EE-4FF9-961A-0BB70FC45C96@mac.com>
I agree. The best combo I've found is Safari 4 (which preserves the
color space) and a level 12 jpeg, but there's still enough loss that
if you're thinking about shooting one of these monsters it WOULD make
a difference.
On May 29, 2009, at 8:53 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>
> uploaded jpg's
> viewed through browsers at 72 dpi
> simply do not get to the visual heart of the matter.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
THEIN Onn Ming
*photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com
www.flickr.com/mingthein
In reply to:
Message from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)