Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] "good enough" (was: a quick hello)
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:59:39 +0000
References: <380-22009552223836985@M2W017.mail2web.com> <C63CAFA6.4EC07%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Mark,

This crop factor argument is just an excuse for not moving to Digital, or 
from a film M to digital M.  Nothing more.

Cheers,
Gene

-------------- Original message from Mark Rabiner <mark at 
rabinergroup.com>: -------------- 


> A respected photographer may not have to be put in a position to justify 
> what gear they are using in terms of brand name. 
> But if they are delivering a format smaller than what was first expected 
> they may have to go into some kind of minor song and dance on it. 
> Leica photographers are used to that its what Leica was first all about. 
> Talking about what they can get in 35 is going to be better in many ways 
> than what the other guys are getting with a Rolleiflex. 
> 
> How guys justify cropped vs. full frame nowadays I don't know and war 
> photography technique no clue but in plenty of cases editors and art 
> directors don't care if you are using Canon or Nikon they do care if your 
> not giving them full frame. 
> In just the past two years. 
> 
> 
> Mark William Rabiner 
> 
> In the 80's and 90's everybody was very impressed by auto focus and the 
> fact 
> that CANON auto focus was at first faster than NIKON. 
> But plenty of people used Leica rangefinders or slrs even with MANUAL 
> FOCUS. 
> BUT THEY WERE NOT SHOOTING HALF FRAME. 
> I'm sure if they were a few art directors and editors might have the 
> temerity to question their notable photog on that.. 
> 
> Leica 72's are rare and big money and normally only seen behind glass. 
> If you try to use one to take pictures they grab you and take you away. 
> 
> 
> 
> > From: "wildlightphoto at earthlink.net" 
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group 
> > Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 19:08:36 -0400 
> > To: 
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] "good enough" (was: a quick hello) 
> > 
> > I know what kind of image quality I want. It doesn't necessarily come 
> > from 
> > a camera that's commonly used in a war zone. It comes from a camera that 
> > meets my needs, not Natcheway's. 
> > 
> > Doug Herr 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Leica Users Group. 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] "good enough" (was: a quick hello))
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] "good enough" (was: a quick hello))
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] "good enough" (was: a quick hello))