[Leica] G10

[henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)]

If sensor size is important, many have larger ones than the G10. The 
DMC G1 certainly provides better image quality than the G10 under any 
conditions, and the Fuji F200EX also does better (I have the G10 and 
tried out the F200EX in some quick tests). The G10 is not bad 
considering the sensor size and 15mp, but it's not at the top of the 
heap under lower lighting conditions. It probabably has somonee of 
the highest pixel densities among the better P&S cameras.


>I really need the extra size of the sensor.
>Even the DMC G1's image samples have been very disappointing.
>As it is, I turned the camera in yesterday at 2:30PM. I got a call a 
>11:30AM today that it was ready. I picked it up at 2:30PM today. 
>Can't fault Canon's customer service, UNLIKE utters. But we won't go 
>there, will we:-)
>S.d.
>
>
>On Apr 28, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:
>
>>  At 7:15 AM -0700 4/28/09, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote:
>>>  Took my G10 over to Canon, at Irvine, yesterday morning.
>>>  Apparently, it's not very dust tight.
>>>  The sensor accumulated debris, which became very noticeable in 
>>>the sky area.
>>>  Because it is a cleaning, it is not covered by the warranty.
>>>  Go figure!
>>>  It's on the edge of becoming the wife's camera.
>>>  Time to shop for another prosumer grade P/S for the camera bag.
>>>  S.d.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Have a look here:
>>
>>  http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pocket.shtml
>>
>>  Hi priorities are obviously not everyone's, but at least he makes 
>>them known and has access to a lot of equipment, so the comparisons 
>>are valid within that context.
>>

-- 

    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com