Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Yes I would agree Geoff's Summicron would outperform a lens which was
>designed many decades ago. And I always root for the slower glass.
>
>The 75 Summicron f2is a lens I yearn for.
>The 75 Summilux 1.4 I don't.
>Its big and old.
>Or to put it more positively the Summicron is new and compact.
>
>
>
>Mark William Rabiner
But Mark, the Summilux also has a smoothness that the Summicron
doesn't. The difference in 'sharpness' at any common aperture isn't
huge between these two; certainly not as big as that between the old
50 Summilux and the new ASPH, but the rendition difference is quite
marked. There is a place for both lenses and I don't think I'm
willing to give up that difference. At f/2 and f/2.8 the new lens has
better mtf results, by by f/4 you'll be hard put to tell the
difference. I have to say that most of the time I like the pictures
the Summilux produces better than those of the Summicron, even though
I carry the Summicron more due to the size.
And f/1.4 can often be useful.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com