Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Henning,
>
>I have examined both images, and, to me, there is a dilemma. To me,
>the first image is not as sharp when viewed at normal gallery size,
>but is very sharp when viewed large. The second image is quite sharp
>at gallery size, but one does not have the opportunity to see the
>larger image if he or she is interested.
>
Yes, that's it exactly. Plus, the image that the gallery software
resized is warmer in tone than the one that is sized correctly. That
also bothers me.
>It seems we have to make a choice. If I have a so-so image, I size
>it so that it can't be enlarged. If I feel the image can stand
>close examination, I upload the larger image.
>
>I have another question. I sometimes upload TIF images, which
>Brian's software converts to JPEG. Does that give a better gallery
>image than uploading a JPEG? I haven't come to a conclusion on that
>yet.
>
>Jim Nichols
I haven't tried the tif option as I usually don't want to upload that
large an image, but I might try it as an experiment.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com