Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Interesting topic - coincidentally I just e-mailed this comment to a Leica fan this morning: Leica/Olympus makes a fine combination until Leica sells something more affordable than the M8. Where is the CL of digital? I was very disappointed that Leica put so much research and money into the new S2. It was like a slap in the face to us faithful 35mm rangefinder fans, still holding onto their wonderful Leica glass in hopes that Leica will make a reasonably priced digital body that they can use those lenses on. Gary Todoroff >There are a number of hints from Dr Kaufmann implying a cheaper M mount >camera, not to supplant the M8 though. Leica does share with Matsushita as >we know. Certainly possible Leica may market a version. I can't speak about >other countries but here Panasonic has thus far positioned their four thirds >products to be too expensive. Technically clever certainly. But the G1 for >example is almost twice the price of the Olympus E420. That makes no sense >to me. I do think that micro four thirds is a logical development. For any >future M, an optical finder with a different frame-line system I can >understand. An EVF like the G1 horrifies me personally. In my opinion a G1 >with red dot (? la the D-Lux and C-Lux) will not appeal to traditional Leica >customers. But a smaller M mount camera priced lower than the M8 may well >do. >2009/2/17 >Geoff