Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gene, I started doing some side by side testing as a joke, thinking there'd be a huge difference. The main comparison I did was head and shoulder portraits in available light. Tripod mounted vs hand held had more impact than which lens I used, especially a lower shutter speeds. No surprise there. The 100E seemed to hold up, right down to the eyelashes. I'm not saying the 100E is as good as the 90 R. It's just a lot closer in performance than I expected. Sometimes lenses show up. Other times they don't. A lot depends on the situation. For sure I have more confidence in the R lens. DaveR -----Original Message----- From: grduprey@mchsi.com [mailto:grduprey@mchsi.com] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:14 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] Re:Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone else Dave, Interesting about your 100 Nikon E lens. ?I had one also and it was not even close to the performance of my 90 Elmarit R. Gene