Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAD 17/01/2009: it is a small world
From: durling at cox.net (Mike Durling)
Date: Mon Jan 19 12:07:54 2009
References: <8DEA3885-1E1B-4A55-A025-61287C0446EA@frozenlight.eu> <49749F90.1090909@cox.net> <5E1F5B9A-13C7-4006-BADB-DEA8697215C0@mac.com>

Its a gut reaction, George.  Maybe charming snapshot is a more apt 
description, since the photo doesn't aspire to high art.  The warm 
expressions on Nathan's subjects draw me in whereas the general effect 
of the others is to keep me at a distance.  Looking back at the 
presidential people portraits I see that a certain percentage of them 
have genuine warm expressions, but the blast of flat lighting really 
puts me off.

Best,

Mike Durling

George Lottermoser wrote:
> I'm at a loss to understand
> how this "is a great portrait"
> and
> the "Dehumanizing portraits"
> are "bad photographs"
>
> for me: Nathan told a heart warming story of connection
> (as he so often does)
> and presented a charming snapshot
> to accompany the story
>
> but "a great portrait?"
> really?
>
>

Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 17/01/2009: it is a small world)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 17/01/2009: it is a small world)
Message from durling at cox.net (Mike Durling) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 17/01/2009: it is a small world)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 17/01/2009: it is a small world)