Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Plagiarism vs. Derivation (re. Prince/Abell)
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Nov 29 14:13:44 2008
References: <796o8r$2d97mi@pd2mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca> <F0C056F3-3D30-4080-BDE6-6E32AE1F55BD@embarqmail.com>

Now, Ric, see you've missed the point all together.
The idea is:
You xerox "Lord of the Rings"
and
sell the xeroxed copy
one off
to an art museum
for 3.2 million dollars

if you published it
you'd be infringing on the copyright

for real

Fond regards,
George

george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist



On Nov 29, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Ric Carter wrote:

>  I'm going to zerox Lord of the Rings and find me a publisher.


In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Plagiarism vs. Derivation (re. Prince/Abell))
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Plagiarism vs. Derivation (re. Prince/Abell))