Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] why do bombs whistle?
From: bill at photobynelsch.com (Bill)
Date: Sun Nov 2 12:21:42 2008
References: <82c9dd70811011405j671e1814v13d368bdd7a1f177@mail.gmail.com><200811012122.mA1LMOGb066266@server1.waverley.reid.org><754E60FA7B522D6DA1DAE716@hindolveston.reid.org><200811021328.mA2DSKpS081465@server1.waverley.reid.org> <a3f189160811020700l61f0cbbaw2bfff1acd91d6789@mail.gmail.com>
Eschew obfuscation.
_________
I voted for That One.
-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bill=photobynelsch.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bill=photobynelsch.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Sonny Carter
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 8:01 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] why do bombs whistle?
The use of obfuscatory in a general conversation could be considered
obfuscatory. ;-)
SonC
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Marc James Small
<marcsmall@comcast.net>wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, Brian. The use of obscure academic slang in a general
> conversation is odd, if not outright obfuscatory.
>
> Marc
>
>
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies:
Reply from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
In reply to:
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)