Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Fri Oct 31 00:21:57 2008
References: <370105078.1342501225386721152.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu><24709389.1342711225386756932.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <20081030134943.663bcf30@linux-019a.site><702B2A09F79E44CDBC14461F0A029272@dadquad> <012901c93b20$6c2de870$4489b950$@net>

Hi yes, the prices are terrible. I got a used 1.25. I think for a plus
magnification the Chinese ones might be OK. Not so for the .85 I believe.
But if you think those Leica magnifier prices are bad, take a look at the
prices for the new external viewfinders. Yikes!
I didn't think it was possible to make finders more expensive than the Zeiss
ones. I was wrong ;-( 
Makes the Voigtlanders look attractive.


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
Maike Harbets speaks on the S2. .... So we will drop down this technology to
our other systems.
Our priority is to modernise the R system which will be in the end an R10,
definitely.

-----Original Message-----
Subject: RE: [Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3

I agree with the improvement using the 1.25 ( I do not have a 1.4, but
believe it will work as well....)

However, the 1.4 costs as much as almost any other manufacturer's SLR 50mm
lens.... !

I guess glass is glass at Leica... 

Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net


The magnifiers are VERY helpful with critical DoF on the 50 and up wide open
as well. 





_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information