Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would hold off getting another 40D, if you need low light capabilities. It seems that it is yet another all new ball game out there with the coming Canon bodies. I suspect that my 40D will be relegated to being my 10-17mm fisheye platform after this September's offerings. S.d. On Jul 22, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Ken Carney wrote: > George, > > I also am a fan of the 10-22. In my bag (thanks be to Lugger Bob > Baron for > steering me to the right bag - I am bag challenged) I keep a 40D > with the > 24-70L attached, and a 20D with the 10-22 attached. Then there are > some > other Canon primes for really low light. The Leica lenses are > probably > better, but I just want to get the image quickly without a lot of > fuss. I > will probably get another 40D body - it is marginally better than > the 20D > IMHO. Fortunately, I don't print large, 10x15 on 13x19 paper, so > the 40D is > fine for that. > > Ken > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug- >> bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Lottermoser >> George >> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:27 PM >> To: Leica Users Group >> Subject: Re: [Leica] About Easing into LeiCanon Photography / Tokina >> examples >> >> hi Douglas, >> >> Both beautiful wide images. >> I had no doubt that the Tokina performs well; and didn't intend to >> suggest anything by my post. >> You simply reminded me that I settled on keeping the 20D "because" of >> the 10 -22. >> In fact at some point I may actually upgrade to a used 30D or 40D >> just for that lens. >> >> Fond regards, >> George >> >> george@imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information