Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica R-10 at Photokina 2008
From: leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Thu May 8 01:39:57 2008
References: <92a2c1a4786d3f6c7b683419d8bd59ba@mail.nine.ch:993 ssl> <C44831C6.AA1B8%mark@rabinergroup.com>

30x30 mathematically. But assuming there's a certain tolerance outside this 
circle it might also be 32x32. 

Why not introducing a circular format? Would make a 1470 mm2 image field for 
a 30mm radius... Next step would be round computer monitors... :-)

Didier


>So what's the biggest square you can fit in a circle 43.266?
>30 or 31mm?
>Which is certainly a more efficient use of your image circle getting you
>more acreage to work with.
>
>30 * 30 = 900
>31 * 31 = 961
>32 * 32 = 1024
>
>24 * 36 = 864
>Mark William Rabiner


>> No. 36x36 fills a larger circle than 24x36.
>> Look this sketch I made once when the discussion was about the same topic:
>> http://mogool.com/transfer/pythagoras.gif
>> Didier


>>> They could very easily go to a 36x36 and keep the current lenses.
>>> Gene


Replies: Reply from fredhess at phenix-visuals.nl (Fred Hess / Phenix Visuals.nl) ([Leica] Leica R-10 at Photokina 2008)
In reply to: Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Leica R-10 at Photokina 2008)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica R-10 at Photokina 2008)