Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] LR 2.0 Public Beta Released
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Thu Apr 3 09:37:20 2008
References: <C4187A05.D687%heninger@adobe.com> <200804031611.AOG45241@rg4.comporium.net> <4cfa589b0804030931i63165f02h39ca18f68d00478f@mail.gmail.com>
 
At 12:31 PM 4/3/2008, you wrote:
>What would that look like, Tina? I'm trying to understand what you're
>thinking about and how you feel it should work. Not that I could do
>anything about it (grin) but I simply don't understand what your
>expectations are.
>
>Thanks
>
>Adam


I just want to be able to order the keywords hierarchically, not 
alphabetically.  Several of my stock agencies use hierarchical 
keywords with different weights being applied to where the keyword is 
in the list.  When buyers search by keywords, the higher a word is in 
the list, the sooner it shows up in the search.  Alphabetical has 
nothing to do with how important the keyword is to that particular photo.

Tina
Replies: Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] LR 2.0 Public Beta Released)
 In reply to: Message from heninger at adobe.com (Wade Heninger) ([Leica] LR 2.0 Public Beta Released)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] LR 2.0 Public Beta Released)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] LR 2.0 Public Beta Released)