Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Thank you ([Leica] could it be a defective lens)
From: qiao_li at mentor.com (Qiao Li)
Date: Thu Mar 27 16:15:14 2008
References: <200803272154.m2RLsbvY060447@server1.waverley.reid.org>

Hi George,

I am rather proud of my cunning scheme. :-)

Yes, less yellow tint would be much desired. I think I under
exposed the shot? I am learning the ropes about guestimating
the correct exposure.

Somehow, I feel either Fuji Superia 400 or Costco development
or both are rather accommodating to exposure deviations.
Sometimes, I even feel guilty about pulling exposure settings
out of thin air. The 24 pictures on a roll must have exposures
running all over the map, yet all photos (two rolls so far)
came back looking reasonable.

I uploaded the a picture of better composition and no yellow
tint at,

        http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/qiao_li/li.jpg.html

All courtesy of Steve. Many thanks, Steve.

Qiao

> Message: 24
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:33:24 -0500
> From: Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com>
> Subject: Re: Thank you ([Leica] could it be a defective lens)
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID: <7A704B0B-87F9-4AFD-9FC5-0F8C31E8FDD6@mac.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
> 
> well there you are - that's the way to sell equipment purchases to  
> SWMBO especially when they're the mother ;~)
> Lovely photo of a beautiful child - a little less yellow perhaps?
> 
> Fond regards,
> George
> george@imagist.com
> www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07