Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:41 AM, leo wesson wrote: > Steve, > > In my experience, a digital neg has more latitude than a conventional > negative. Plus 1, minus 1 stop, all well within the raw latitude. thanks Leo... so if I understand, the RAW IS affected by the light settings, it's just that there is sufficient latitude so that corrections can be successfully applied later... if it's not "right", as we do with film negatives... is this correct? Steve > > > > Leo Wesson > Photographer/Videographer > 817.733.9157 > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> > wrote: > >> >> On Mar 3, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: >> >>> As far as I know, it is. >> >> >> I am somehow having trouble with this Jayanand... >> >> >> as this says that camera settings affecting the amount of light >> hitting the sensor, do not change the "negative"... >> >> >> but we all know that a true film negative is altered by these >> setttings. >> >> >> Since RAW is the digital negative, why is that not also affected ? >> >> Anyone ? >> >> >> >> Steve >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information best, Steve Barbour "I never wanted to be famous" out soon. kididdoc@cox.net