Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:They call it a HASSELblad because __________.
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Thu Feb 14 06:49:16 2008
References: <4268A9826B9DBE4D938B902A6BC80308394902@exchange8.asc.local>

I'd stick with a WLF. I had a 45' and never used it. I added a Beattie 
screen to my WLF, what a difference compared to the stock 
screen!

Of course I sold the Hassy because I kept getting kicked out of churches 
during ceremonies :)

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kyle Cassidy" <kcassidy@asc.upenn.edu>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 8:20 AM
Subject: [Leica] They call it a HASSELblad because __________.



Okay, so I broke the magnifying thingie on my Leica 500CM (to be honest, _I_ 
didn't break it, it broke all by itself) someone had 
recommended just buying a new waist level finder -- there dont seem to be a 
huge number of them on ebay (there's one for a Kiev88, 
but something in my mind says that doesn't fit the 500cm, but some OTHER 
hasselblad?) but there are a bunch of 45' angel finders. is 
this a good option? should i "upgrade"? any experience with the 45' finder 
as opposed to the wlf?

danke!

kc

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] They call it a HASSELblad because __________.)