Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Wed Jan 23 06:03:30 2008
References: <19B72D38-07F4-49F1-AE01-459DCBD38508@charter.net> <47961415.20009@waltjohnson.com> <BF57158F-13FD-491F-8CD6-23241AAEFFB6@mac.com> <47962C5F.9070207@waltjohnson.com> <5F937C58-2C9D-4837-8F52-BF021DDDB8E7@mac.com> <00d201c85d28$f18db490$0202a8c0@MacPhisto> <3B791B6F-6AA1-454C-9978-E869F6391286@mac.com> <67CC0163-222D-4E08-A279-3AD84F1AD500@mac.com> <47966798.7020802@waltjohnson.com> <2E16D912-E20E-46E7-9D6B-BE264D15283C@mac.com> <47968C74.20707@waltjohnson.com> <p06230902c3bc40d9ddf8@[10.1.16.134]>

Henning

I'm going to Orlando today looking for a camera bag. Maybe I'll pick up 
a 4x5 while there. Can you image the results from putting my 28 Elmarit 
on a Speed Graphic? Heck, could shoot what's in from of me and behind me 
at the same time. :-)

Walt

Henning Wulff wrote:
> At 7:38 PM -0500 1/22/08, Walt Johnson wrote:
>> Yes, can cerainly see that. A 4x5/5x7 back on an 8x10 camera. 
>> Reversing that trend might give less than optimal results, even with 
>> Leica glass.  . What was mentioned by Doug included a 35mm lens on a 
>> MF camera. Talk about falloff. It would make a 50 year old Summicron 
>> look good shooting into the sun.
>
>
>
> Nope. No falloff. Most of the older Leica lenses 135mm and longer 
> cover 6x6 just fine, with no falloff.
>
> And of course most 'large format' lenses come with no format attached. 
> A 120 SW Nikkor makes a fine 4x5 lens with lots of movements but will 
> also cover 8x10 with virtually no movements.
>
>
>
> Anyway, I'm still lusting after  the C3 carried by Diane Arbus..
>>
>> Lottermoser George wrote:
>>>  As a photographer who grew up in a studio where we had lenses of 
>>> many different focal lengths, and cameras of all formats; the whole 
>>> format thing never bothered me. We put 4x5 and 5x7 backs on 8x10 
>>> cameras. Roll film backs on 4x5 cameras. 35mm and digital bodies on 
>>> bellows with enlarging lenses. What ever it takes to accomplish the 
>>> vision or find a new one.
>>>
>>>  Right now I've got a Canon 5D sitting on my desk with a Hasselbad 
>>> 80 planar attached to it.
>>>  And an the M8 with viso and bellows with a nikkor enlarging lens - 
>>> see today's <http://www.imagist.com/blog> for results.
>>>
>>>  I've always enjoyed playing with different glass on various 
>>> formats, slow, fast, b&w, or IR films, chips and what ever. I've 
>>> exposed printing out paper in cameras, used paper negatives and 
>>> contact printed them "wet." It's all photography. It's all wonderful 
>>> and full of potentially beautiful surprises.
>>>
>>>  Camera / lens systems are great. I'll never sell my M6TTL. The 
>>> Leica M lenses can always fill it's negatives to their full useable 
>>> circles; just as the two R8's can give me a full 35mm negatives, 
>>> transparencies, or the DMR chip to capture my world in images - as 
>>> required or desired. Adapters which allow different systems to 
>>> interact with each other make the optical possibilities even more 
>>> wonderful. I can even hang my R8's on 4x5 if I want some view camera 
>>> movements.
>>>
>>>  Imagine! Yes, indeed! Do!
>>>
>>>  On Jan 22, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Walt Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Imagine spending $$$ on lenses designed to cover a 24x36 mm format 
>>>> and sticking them on something else.
>>>
>>>  Fond regards,
>>>  George
>>>  george@imagist.com
>>>  www.imagist.com
>>>  http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>  Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Leica Users Group.
>>>  See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman)
Reply from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman)
In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] M8 sighting)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] M8 sighting)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] M8 sighting)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] M8 sighting)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] M8 sighting)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Re:M8 sighting now how many retinas equal a busch pressman)