Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG : #018
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Fri Jan 18 07:41:02 2008
References: <002301c859a0$201c63b0$5c964754@GeeBee> <479050C6.8000902@tele2.fr> <000c01c859a1$e90bcad0$5c964754@GeeBee>
 
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:15 AM, geebee wrote:

> From: "Philippe AMARD" <philippe.amard@tele2.fr>
>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG : #018
>
>
>> Looks a little posed - feet -
>>> http://www.geebeephoto.com/2008/08018.htm
>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Damn ! Nothing gets by you guys :-) You're absolutely right of  
> course it was totally posed because I wanted the shadow exactly  
> there. The 'static' look never entered my head. Damn!

mais ca tombe comme un cheveux sur la soupe...


how about the shadow without the person,    geebs...?


Steve




>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from geebee at geebeephoto.com (geebee) ([Leica] IMG : #018)
 In reply to: Message from geebee at geebeephoto.com (geebee) ([Leica] IMG : #018)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] IMG : #018)
Message from geebee at geebeephoto.com (geebee) ([Leica] IMG : #018)