Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/01/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica]The new T-Max 400
From: leica68 at gmail.com (parker haeg)
Date: Wed Jan 9 17:02:47 2008
References: <30BB23E1-3745-4501-92DF-ED90843A2720@cox.net> <47852436.1030307@waltjohnson.com> <F43DE963-E72A-465F-92A7-8909C31A5285@cox.net> <47852C85.5080207@waltjohnson.com> <00e101c85317$306863c0$0200a8c0@robertbxucevjs>
The editor makes note of it in this month's Shutterbug "letter from the
editor". It sounds very interesting and I can't wait to try it.
Is it supposed to be a c-41?
On 1/9/08, Robert Meier <robertmeier@usjet.net> wrote:
>
> Has anyone gotten ahold of any of the new T-Max 400? B&H tells me their
> purchasing agent doesn't know anything about it!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies:
Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
In reply to:
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)