Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Sun Dec 23 07:08:57 2007
References: <df819c3941678622cccf06799a3048e6@teleport.com> <380109.30275.qm@web90401.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <a2f8f4470712220645j316fa76fiaf79dbefdc3df74e@mail.gmail.com> <44669446-48E3-42EF-A4E0-225B067ECFC9@charter.net> <a2f8f4470712221002u3256ae89w1a796bd10def3fed@mail.gmail.com> <333BF82A-E0A3-48B7-8C0B-2D5C19D0BC80@charter.net> <a2f8f4470712222246w3eaa26bbvd5d909bb06dfaf9d@mail.gmail.com> <46A3FEBA-C0B0-46D3-8515-7D591CA90C4E@charter.net>

S.D.

Sorry but the flickr filter won't allow viewing these photos without  
signing in.

Len


On Dec 23, 2007, at 9:30 AM, slobodan dimitrov wrote:

> Almost looks like Fed quality. Overly not bad, but lacking the  
> gauzy blown effect of a Summar.
> I'm sure you've seen these before, but they are worth another look.
> Shot by Sanders:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/sandersnyc/1512042081/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/sandersnyc/1512471588/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/sandersnyc/1512089964/
>
> s.d.
>
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 10:46 PM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
>
> I don't know if mine is early, but these are wide-open.
>
> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/ 
> 2007v4748/07v47-0003.jpg.html
> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/ 
> 2007v4748/07v47-0004.jpg.html
> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/ 
> 2007v4748/07v47-0001.jpg.html
>
> I have another shot of the last one taken with a Nikon D80, if anyone
> is interested in a comparison. By comparison I am thinking mainly of
> b/w contra color, not the lens characteristics.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On Dec 23, 2007 4:01 AM, slobodan dimitrov <s.dimitrov@charter.net>  
> wrote:
>> An early Summitar might just do then.
>> s.d.
>>
>>
>> On Dec 22, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
>>
>> Slobodan,
>>
>> My guess is the main difference will be the one between 3.5 and 2.0.
>> It's the very narrow depth of field that I'm interested in playing
>> with.
>>
>> I'll never say a bad thing about Elmars. Both of my yearbook shots  
>> are
>> with Elmars :-)
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Dec 22, 2007 3:52 PM, slobodan dimitrov <s.dimitrov@charter.net>
>> wrote:
>>> How different is an uncoated Elmar, wide open, from a Summar?
>>> s.d.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 22, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
>>>
>>> If you find two, I'd be interested.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 22, 2007 5:59 AM, Bill Smith <wrs111445@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Mark:
>>>>
>>>>   Thanks for the tip. You guys are just a cornucopia of knowledge
>>>> today--maybe it's because it's wintertime and everybody is bored to
>>>> tears. Whatever, I appreciate it.
>>>>
>>>>   Bill
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mark Kronquist <mak@teleport.com> wrote:
>>>>   Pretty sure Jake at Blue Moon has one he has scads of Leica stuff
>>>> these
>>>> days 503 978 0333 Texas Leica (Fuji RF too) www.bluemooncamera.com
>>>> On Dec 21, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Bill Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have one in good to excellent condition for sale?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo!
>>>>> Search.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>> Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted)
In reply to: Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted)
Message from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Uncoated Summar wanted)