Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Slide Scanner vs Slide Duplicator
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Sat Nov 10 22:03:39 2007
References: <200711110317.AFS98831@rg4.comporium.net>

At 07:18 PM 11/10/2007, Tina Manley wrote:
>PESO:
>
>I've been experimenting with using a Beseler Slide Duplicator and 
>the Canon 5D instead of a Nikon LS5000 Slide Scanner for both B&W 
>and Kodachrome slides.  I still prefer the scanner for other films 
>but for grainy, contrasty films that you can't use Digital ICE with, 
>the slide duplicator seems to do a better job.  I know you can't 
>really tell anything from a web-sized photo (at least I can't!)  but 
>here are the comparisons for one photo:
>
>Scanner:  http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/88718456
>
>Duplicator:  http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/88746181
>
>I can tell a big difference in the full-sized tiffs.  They are both 
>sharper and less contrasty - which is something I haven't been able 
>to achieve with the scanned slides.

But which one looks closer to the original? Kodachrome is notoriously 
difficult to scan.


// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
please use richard at imagecraft.com) 


Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Slide Scanner vs Slide Duplicator)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Slide Scanner vs Slide Duplicator)