Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Sat Nov 3 18:46:13 2007
References: <200711022015.lA2KFm9s059918@dragonsgate2.imagecraft.com> <C3529932.736BC%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
Wide Angle Tri-Elmar, what else can this stand for?

Wookie Angular Toothless Elf?

How about what lens that can possibly have a 16mm in it? You have 16 
Zeiss, 16 Hologon, and.... WATE. There you go.


At 05:31 PM 11/3/2007, Mark Rabiner wrote:

>Its so cool that you guys know what WATE means. I wonder who else does?
>

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
please use richard at imagecraft.com)
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)