Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] really ?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Wed Jul 11 10:44:53 2007
References: <079127B0-6331-4B23-8908-245D280037AE@cox.net> <B6134470-6FAC-4C32-9598-96713697AAB9@mac.com> <729A881A-4A11-4525-80CF-948F036DFCAE@cox.net> <46950D74.9060102@mcclary.net>

Photographers (especially those with a documentary/journalistic bent)  
have an interest in many subjects, especially earth changing subjects:
Bringing these front page stories to "light" has a great deal to do  
with whether Doug will have birds to photograph in 10 - 20 years.

Here's some photography to add to the discussion:
<http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/11/edward_burtynsk.php>

and then  ;~)
<http://aofg.blogs.com/the_airing_of_grievances/science/index.html>
<http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/designoids/>
<http://inkbluesky.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/>
<http://www.pacinst.org/publications/online_update/ 
year_in_review_2006.html>
<http://www.csicop.org/si/9711/conference.html>
<http://www.rwor.org/a/1274/cameron-science-art.htm>

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Jul 11, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Harrison McClary wrote:

> What does all this have to do with Leica Photography?  If you all  
> want to talk about this please do it amongst yourselves.


Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] really ?)
In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] really ?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] really ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] really ?)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] really ?)