Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/07/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Tue Jul 3 08:32:46 2007
References: <70d5554f0707030606m107c87b7hf1b1067fadbfcb49@mail.gmail.com> <F4E3550C-87FA-42F2-80C9-FE322DE49186@mac.com>
OY - such a tiring an argument I haven't seen (sorry.. channelling my
Brooklyn ancestors)
Here is yoru answer:
10 BUY X
20 TAKE (PICTURES)
30 PRINT (PICTURES)
40 If (PICTURES <= GREAT) and (time elapsed > 12 months) then SELL X ELSE
GOTO 20
40 GOTO 10
3 years later ..I still have my Hasselblad
Replies:
Reply from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?)
Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?)
In reply to:
Message from benmarks2005 at gmail.com (Benjamin Marks) ([Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?)