Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] do i need a hasselblad?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Tue Jul 3 08:02:29 2007
References: <4268A9826B9DBE4D938B902A6BC8030814ED73@exchange8.asc.local> <9b678e0707021710m455e4f98rd5aced3afe5000a4@mail.gmail.com> <468A14B6.1020708@summaventures.com> <02ab01c7bd72$9bbfd3f0$d33f7bd0$@net>

In general I agree with you. However, when the 500CM was my camera of  
choice for commercial and portrait work (some years ago now) I became  
quite proficient at using the "mirror up / rear shutter open switch"  
just before making the exposure. You then expose with a very soft and  
vibration free between-the-lens shutter. For portraiture; I found  
that the loud release generally gave the subject the impression that  
the photo had been "taken;" they relaxed a tad and then I actually  
got this "more relaxed" image. In the last days of regular use - this  
pre-release approach had become my hassy-technique in 90% of my  
images; whether people, places or product. As I read this thread I  
can feel this lovely machine in my hand's memory and hear the  
sequence of loud slap followed by the compur's whisper in my ear's  
memory. Ah nostalgia!

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Jul 3, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Frank Filippone wrote:

> Yes, it is possible to use the 500CM without a tripod.  You can  
> hand hold
> it.  However, you are using a Hasselblad because, presumably,  you  
> want the
> very best image quality possible.  That means a tripod, to me.


In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)