Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/07/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] do i need a hasselblad?
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue Jul 3 07:04:23 2007
References: <4268A9826B9DBE4D938B902A6BC8030814ED73@exchange8.asc.local> <9b678e0707021710m455e4f98rd5aced3afe5000a4@mail.gmail.com> <468A14B6.1020708@summaventures.com> <02ab01c7bd72$9bbfd3f0$d33f7bd0$@net> <468A52F2.3050602@dlridings.se>
Why do you say this? The purpose of getting the best image quality is
certainly anal, slow, and precise. Mirror lock up is a requirement. No
candids need apply.
Did I forget the cable release ( unless you get a 200 series) and the lens
shade? The GG focusing back ( required on the FlexBody, useful on the SWC)
nor the high magnification viewfinders, and the 45 degree prism?
Are you getting a better picture of using a Blad for the ultimate image?
Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net
Frank Filippone wrote:
> and lock up the mirror before firing the shutter.
Wow! They are even worse than an Exacta!
:-)
Daniel
Replies:
Reply from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)
In reply to:
Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] do i need a hasselblad?)