Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gene, Maybe the conclusion is that Leica shouldn't make such fast (and BIG) lenses :-) I've said it in another posting, but cracked body shells is hardly unique to the M8. I have a couple of them to my name when it comes to traditional M's. Sonny might very well be right when he described this as "pilot error". If I was an M8 users I wouldn't be too bent out of shape. I'd sure be careful with tripods bending things out of shape, but that is nothing new. Just try putting a Rolleiflex on a tripod without any special additions to the body and you can run into problems pretty quick too. Daniel grduprey@mchsi.com wrote: > Daniel, > > Overall i would agree, but the single piece body is much costlier to > produce and probably repair. Since everyone seems to beat on Leica about > the cost of initial purchase and repair costs, and the need to reduce > these in future products, this is probably why they went this route. Then > again just about every other camera company uses this method with little > or no problem. Another reason they probably did it this time. I am > leaning on waiting to see what the analysis of the failures shows at this > time. I am using mine on a hand grip mounted to the m8 so i can shoot one > handed, and so far it has worked just fine with no indications of loose > fit it stress. I have another 7 weeks to go before i have use of both > hands again. The down side is it is very clumsy to work this way with the > camera, and one handed is not good for shakeiness. ;-) > > Gene > >