Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Mon May 7 14:09:26 2007
References: <000301c7901b$5d5de5e0$619acc48@GATEWAY> <2CC34D05-E7D7-4825-A7F5-C2095D3AD14C@charter.net> <006401c790e6$da63f450$2101a8c0@luispersonal>

On the edge, but that's how I like them.
Thanks for showing,
Philippe



Op 7-mei-07, om 22:32 heeft Luis Ripoll het volgende geschreven:

> Hi Slobodan,
>
> I had a hard work editing this picture with the new Elmar-M, of  
> course it is
> a very strong light situation, and I'm sure that it would be very  
> difficult
> to manage with any other lens, but on a such crazy test...
>
>  http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3023665
>
> Saludos cordiales
> Luis
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En  
> nombre de
> slobodan dimitrov
> Enviado el: domingo, 06 de mayo de 2007 23:44
> Para: Leica Users Group
> Asunto: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5  
> Summaron -
> NowSummitar
>
> I have a LTM Summitar from the early 1950's. While of a slightly lower
> contrast, what it gains in flare makes it virtually useless near  
> the ocean.
> out here.
> Now the new Elmar-M, that's a different story. Less prone to flare,  
> if at
> all, and smooth consistent luminosity under the worst possible light
> condition.
>
> S. Dimitrov
>
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 1:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>
>> I mean pancake flat, like an Elmar. Daniel want to put it in his
>> trouser pocket.
>>
>> But now that you mention it, last week a guest speaker at the LHSA
>> spring shoot mentioned some excellent low contrast Leica lenses,  
>> but I
>> failed to write it down. Like you, I get terrible contrast  
>> problems in
>> the subtropical sun down here. The lens he mentioned was probably
>> single-coated, post-WWII.
>> It wasn't the Summarit or the Summaron (I have both of those). My
>> recollection (fuzzy) was that it was a Summitar. Anyone out there use
>> one of those these days?
>>
>> Jeffery Smith
>> New Orleans, LA
>> http://www.400tx.com
>> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>> slobodan dimitrov
>> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 2:07 PM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5  
>> Summaron
>>
>>
>> In my lighting environment, the harbors of LA and LB, their contrast
>> suits me just fine.
>>
>> S. Dimitrov
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 6, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I started one re: people's thoughts on 35mm LTM lenses, but I
>>> didn't care if they were FLAT.
>>>
>>> Jeffery Smith
>>> New Orleans, LA
>>> http://www.400tx.com
>>> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Daniel Ridings
>>> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 3:16 AM
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5
>>> Summaron
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is it my brain or did we have a 35mm LTM thread last week or the
>>>> week
>>>> before Remember how I mentioned my Summaron? Others mentioned
>>>> others?
>>>
>>> I am sorry to have missed it. I have had to pass over hundreds, if
>>> not a
>>> couple thousand, postings lately. I just haven't been able to keep
>>> up.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the tip. I'll check out the archives.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron - Now Summitar)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron - Now Summitar)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)